サワダ タツノリ
Tatsunori Sawada
澤田 辰徳 所属 医療保健学部 リハビリテーション学科 作業療法学専攻 職種 教授 |
|
言語種別 | 英語 |
発行・発表の年月 | 2024 |
形態種別 | 学術論文 |
査読 | 査読あり |
標題 | Characteristics of goal-setting tools in adult rehabilitation: A scoping review. |
執筆形態 | 共著 |
掲載誌名 | Clin Rehabil |
掲載区分 | 国外 |
出版社・発行元 | SAGE |
巻・号・頁 | 38(2),pp.234-250 |
総ページ数 | 16 |
国際共著 | 国際共著 |
著者・共著者 | Okita Y, Kawaguchi Y, Inoue Y, Ohno K, Sawada T, Levack W, Tomori K. |
概要 | Objectives: This scoping review aims to map the literature on goal-setting tools in adult rehabilitation, exploring their characteristics, target users and supporting evidence to inform practice and future research in this area.
Methods: We completed a comprehensive search of four databases to identify relevant articles on tools for goal setting in rehabilitation. We followed Arkey and O'Malley's scoping review process to guide article selection, data extraction and data analysis. Results: We identified a total of 165 studies that reported on 55 different goal-setting tools, including tools for goal selection and goal documentation (n = 31), goal setting and intervention planning (n = 15), and for measuring the quality of the goal-setting process (n = 9). Over half of the tools were primarily designed for use in rehabilitation of physical disabilities (n = 32). Some tools fell under multiple sub-categories based on their characteristics as follows: 22 framework tools, 12 interview tools, 9 outcome measurement tools for goal achievement, 6 outcome measurement tools for goal quality and 25 documentation tools. The majority of goal-setting instruments targeted goals at the level of activity and participation (n = 51) and aimed to facilitate a client-centred or shared decision-making approach to rehabilitation planning (n = 46). Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive overview of existing goal-setting tools, highlighting their characteristics, target users and identified needs. These findings can enhance practitioners' awareness of the range of goal-setting tools available and can enable more effective utilization of these tools in clinical practice. Further research should investigate how clinicians can combine multiple tools to deliver goal setting. |
外部リンクURL | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/02692155231197383?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org |